🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". A law is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to approve a law increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," said a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. One foundation established by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing dangerous social media material suggests that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," commented a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the local level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain politicians to copy the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international debate continues, the policies of this nation and others indicate that states internationally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.